tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-17537418.post751337579069482232..comments2023-11-20T02:15:13.078-08:00Comments on Bosun's Sail Locker: ME, Sudan, and Germany News Round-UpBos'unhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/01124504233775125820noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-17537418.post-34741190029337381682007-03-18T02:59:00.000-07:002007-03-18T02:59:00.000-07:00I understand where you are stand. I happen to agre...I understand where you are stand. I happen to agree with you. That is why you do not see any banners on this site! <BR/><BR/>I do believe we should go in triple force. al Qaida is in those mountains. Don't forget that just because OBL left, does not mean his whole minions left with him.<BR/><BR/>I was looking at this genocide in the form of WWII. Let me see...did we sing Kum by ya then? Hmm...Rosemary Welchhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14400569923078517570noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-17537418.post-78558287483537236082007-03-10T09:19:00.000-08:002007-03-10T09:19:00.000-08:00ah yes, Sudan. Everyone wants to "do somethiing". ...ah yes, Sudan. Everyone wants to "do somethiing". <BR/><BR/>But the reality is that most of the people who want to "do something" are looking for a free solution. That is, they want something without risk or pain. This is why they prattle about the need for a 'strong UN resolution'. Anyone who has taken even a cursory look at the situation knows that the UN will do nothing.<BR/><BR/>If you propose stronger action, whether they involve the military or not, you're quickly accused of "unilateralism" or warned of the negative consequences of your proposals.<BR/><BR/>And that's just the point. Anything that stands a chance of changing the situation will most likely incur negative consquences. So until these folks are willing to risk them, I don't buy their "concern" for Darfur/Sudan.Tom the Redhunterhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01989584196825992054noreply@blogger.com